Sorry, I have nothing against you personally. And as I said, you're legit. I just don't consider anything that's final ROMs as a prototype, regardless of it being on a bare PCB, which seems sometimes to be the sole reason that a lot of things still get to be called prototype, when they're in fact the same as the retail released game. 

I'm just very picky and strict with how stuff should be named. ESPECIALLY since it's for that reason that people like DreamTR can sell something for a bundle showing it as a bare pcb or anything that looks like it came from a dev, and say "this is a prototype", and then can't even show you a single screenshot or anything to justify the value besides the fact that the game is a popular franchise. If you get the game and find out it's a final version, you'd probably get told "no sir, you bought a prototype. it may be the final version but still, it's a prototype." See what I'm getting at? 

Personally if something is a very early version of the game's development, only then does it deserve the title. I just can't wrap my head around how something that is clearly a final product, only not wrapped up with a label and all like the retail product, can be called prototype when that defies the very definition of prototype altogether(it's not an early design of any sort anymore, it's..well, the FINAL product :P)

Didn't mean to come off as if I thought you were selling things you put together in your garage or something. It's just a pet peeve that the whole collecting community I think needs to fix, kinda like also how if it's not a proto, then it's a "beta", when the majority of people don't even know what qualifies as a beta as opposed to alpha to begin with i.e Sonic 2 beta, which is more an alpha.

And there you have it :)